kef r3 vs

Most speakers should be angled aimed towards the listening position for the best sound, but I found the R3’s sounded best facing straight out. The hi-fi reviews I've read were all praising it. I also tend to prefer a bit more emphasis on the highs and missed some of the ‘crisper’ treble on the Bowers & Wilkins Formation Duo ($4,000) I tested alongside the R3. Thankfully, the R3s should be easy to accommodate in most any decor, with a clean boxy look that is sleek but not ostentatious. aluminium dome tweeter Uni-Q array that pushes performance to new extremes. Using computational fluid dynamics the flare and profile of each port is calculated to delay the onset of turbulence and the flexible port walls prevent resonances from colouring the midrange. It’s called Plugged In – Of course, before you put down that kind of cash on a pair of speakers, you’ll probably want something to make sure it actually looks nice too. Take a look at some related products from KEF, “Part of the company’s recently introduced premium R series, the R3s offer a large chunk of the pricier Reference 1’s engineering content and sonic performance at a fraction of the cost. It’s a speaker of highly neutral character, with which little feels particularly emphasized or omitted. The R3 stand-mounted speaker ($2,000 per pair) is a 3-way, rear-ported design that combines the new 12th-generation Uni-Q with a 6-inch bass driver. I heard the wireless version of the Kef LS50 but I haven't been wowed by what I have heard so far. Vocals sound natural, with little apparent coloration or emphasis. Nicely finished in the piano black, so that goes some way … The 3 Im looking at are the kef r3s the ultra towers and the MA gold 100 5g. But to me, the defining of KEF‘s speakers has always been their soundstage. TNW uses cookies to personalize content and ads to Both of these speakers are pretty similar and that is because the R3 is the successor to the R300s. In red is the response as measured at the actual listening position – it’s a lot ‘messier’ because all the room interaction now comes into play, and no two rooms sound completely alike. Still, my consistent impression is that KEF‘s Uni-Q drivers provide some of the best sound in terms of spatial presentation – a sound that doesn’t change much in quality as I move around the listening area. The result is purer and more precise sound with stronger imaging. Copyright © 2006—2021. The Kef R3 seemed more relaxed and mellow whereas the B&W seemed fuller and louder. However, as our hearing adapts to our surroundings, the speaker will still be perceived as neutral. Hopefully this article will clear up some misconceptions about bi-wiring and help you make your best decision when setting up your system. I don't live in a perfect world. No matter how good your speakers sound, you’ll spend more time looking than listening to them. Did you know we have a newsletter all about consumer tech? It will come down to Ribbon tweeter, Proac, which tend to be extremely detailed, vs AMT, Monitor Audio's, which have a slightly more laid back top end compared to a true Ribbon vs the seemless quality of having all drivers made out of the same material in the KEF, plus the soundstaging capabilites and imaging that come from a true point source. aluminium dome … The Difference between the KEF R300 and KEF R3 Bookshelf Loudspeakers: The difference between the R300 and the R3s should be clear by now. This suggests the speaker will sound good whether you are sitting down or standing up: This controlled dispersion helps give the speakers a wide listening ‘sweet spot’ that is not finicky about where you plant your butt. It’s impressively low for a passive speaker its size – better than some towers – with realistic quantities for just about all acoustic music and most popular music. advertising & analytics. The evolution of KEF's Uni-Q driver reaches its 12th generation in the R Series. It is as if the instruments and artist are in my room! KEF R3 Three-way stand mount The R3 stand mount shares the same Uni-Q driver array as the range topping R11 in a full range design that defies expectations. Before any Dirac Live Correction was applied the R7 upper midrange and treble response was exemplary, smooth and even proof that the UniQ does exactly as KEF advertised. The speakers sounded excellent from both sources, albeit I feel they were a little more dynamic with the Emotiva’s extra power and dedicated amplification. In fact, the horizontal measurements suggest the speakers are actually slightly smoother around 15 to 30 degrees off-axis. **, Subscribe to our newsletter to receive news, updates, free stuff and new releases by email. Here's my thoughts on three well known coaxial speaker designs. Share Followers 0. Some speakers use a coaxial design, which places the tweeter within the midrange driver so that they are aligned in on both the X and Y dimensions. make our site easier for you to use. My amp: Rega Elex-R, DAC: Arcam. I own the r3 and they an amazing speaker for a largish standmount. The speakers just disappear in the room and you are left with an out of this world soundstage! Reply to this topic; Start new topic; Recommended Posts. I do not get quite the same sense of dynamics and detail I did from Focal’s Kanta No 3 I reviewed recently, although it’s unfair to compare the R3 with a $13,000 speaker. In this regard, it also sounds more refined than KEF‘s own LS50 or LS50W. Kef LS50 (hit & miss) v new Kef R3, ATC SCM11 Bookself Speakers Sign in to follow this . That KEF achieved such a result in a passive design speaks to impressive engineering. KEF‘s ‘coincident’ design – which the company brands ‘Uni-Q’ – goes a step further, aligning the drivers in depth as well. By Bigwig07, October 13, 2018 in 2 Channel. aluminium dome tweeter Uni-Q array that pushes performance to new extremes. ... My dealer is getting some of the new Kef Rs in soon, so will give them a try. We do also share that information with third parties for I suggest going with the r7 and retain the subs. I'm planning on buying a pair of KEF R3s (very good local deal and will buy without auditioning first unfortunately). The R Series ports have innovative flexible walls. JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. Kef LS50 (hit & miss) v new Kef R3, ATC SCM11 Bookself Speakers. I really need help in deciding which one to get. Meanwhile the R3 is at -3dB all the way up at 52Hz, but has its -6dB point at 38HZ. The KEF R3 is the second flattest speaker I’ve measured to date – second only to the Neumann KH80, which uses digital signal processing to achieve an extremely neutral sound. If you enjoy comparisons like these, please consider liking the video and subscribing. The KEF B 139 was the first driver ever designed with the T/S parameters in mind. If you’re looking for new speakers and have $2,000 to blow, the R3 merit serious consideration. So Kef R300 tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Elac Adante AS-61, as seen on the chart below. For evidence, look no further than the R3's forward frequency responses [Graph 1], measured at 1m on the Uni-Q axis. You can observe many of these qualities in basic measurements. In the world of enthusiast speakers, few names stand out as much as KEF. The R Series was created to sound its best with or without grilles. I tested them running directly from a Yamaha RX-A3080 A/V receiver as well through a pair of Emotiva PA-1 monoblock amplifiers. Your mileage may vary. This means that both high and midrange frequencies emanate from the same point in space. Woah, they’re big. That’s why subwoofers are so flexible about placement.). The Shadow Flare is an innovative way to cut harmful high frequency cabinet diffraction. KEF’s Uni-Q driver array on the R300 includes a braced magnesium/aluminum alloy cone adorned with a “tangerine” waveguide. The R3 is pretty, sounds great no matter where you’re listening from, and is not finicky about placement. 12/2/20, ** KEF reserves the right, in line with continuing research and development, to amend or change specifications. In the above graph, I’ve placed the speaker on a turntable and measured frequency response at 15-degree intervals. Bi-wiring is the use of two separate cables from the same amplifier to the MF/HF and the LF terminals, respectively, on your loudspeakers. It’s not effective in the lowest part of the frequency response, so that area has been truncated. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser. The result is vastly improved fine detail. That means anything the R300 can do, … In a typical room with rampant reflections, a flat speaker‘s frequency response will actually be tilted such that the bass is higher than the treble. Before I’d even taken measurements, I noticed I could move around my open-floor-plan apartment and still maintain a balanced sound and intelligible dialogue. The vertical response, measured at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 30 degrees above and below the tweeter, shows similar results. Don’t confuse flat with boring though. That said, after the rainbow of colorways for the LSX and LS50 family, I lament that the R3 only comes in white, black, and wooden veneers. The similarly-sized KEF R3 reaches all the way down 38Hz, and the noticeably smaller Buchardt S400 goes almost as low as the KEFs. The treble is smooth – veering only to sharpness or dullness if present in the recording. (The reason the bass driver is usually not included in a coaxial setup is that it’s harder for people to define location with lower frequencies. Price Match Guarantee. Find low everyday prices and buy online for delivery or in-store pick-up. midrange driver with 25mm (1 in.) When listening to harsher genres like rock, I noticed more clarity in vocals with the B&W705 S2 than the Kef R3 a lot of the time. When it comes to generating deep, articulate bass, port design is crucial. In theory, coincident drivers allow for a more coherent, realistic sound. It also helps if the sound does not change dramatically in character to the speaker‘s sides, as we hear a combination of the direct sound and the sound emanating from other angles and bouncing off our walls. KEF recommends an amplifier capable of 15 to 180 Watts into 8 Ohms, but I’d advise aiming for the higher end of that scale, (having too little power is worse than too much). level 2. The R7 & R3 were on either side of them and each was a wonder to behold. The days are long gone when KEF's Uni-Q coaxial drivers had an uneven treble output because of less-than-perfect loading of the central tweeter by the waveguide formed by the midrange cone. They continue the tone-on-tone approach to match the various cabinet finishes and the edges are burnished for a suede-like effect. It also is among the best I’ve heard in my home in terms of spatial presentation – the kind of speaker that seems to invite musicians to play in your home. What's more, the R3 is a relatively unfussy design when it comes to both positioning and partnering equipment. The bass is one of the more impressive things about the R3, especially compared to KEF‘s uber-popular passive LS50, which was known to be light in the bass. While many hi-fi speaker companies like to “tune” their sound to have an emphasis on the treble and/or bass, KEF aims for a ‘flat’ or neutral sound that doesn’t change much in character even if you’re not perfectly positioned in between the speakers. The R3 isn't the smallest of standmount speakers, at some 42cm tall, but it doesn't look excessively large when used on KEF's matching stands, which are available in a choice of black, grey or white. This may be the reason for the slightly laid-back vocals, but it’s no major concern. Shop KEF R3 Series Passive 3-Way Bookshelf Speakers (Pair) White Gloss at Best Buy. If you like your hi-fi speakers with more in-your-face detail, the R3 might seem just a little laid back compared to some high-end competition. It's a carefully profiled transition that extends the waveguide effect of Uni-Q. I'm still trying to decide between KEF R3 and Monitor Audio Silver 200 but I'm definitely leaning towards the KEF. Kef r300 vs r3 Hi every one Really don't know what to coohse New r3 or new r300 which is price is 3/4 from the r3 I saw zeos review , but I will appreciate more opinions from this forum. ... TX. This is one to buy with confidence.”, “The sound with KEF's R5-based system is no less detailed..., but it offers high-end performance in a more controlled, polite way with music and ample excitement for both surround music and movies.”, Magazine / Issuing Body: Sound and Vision, "We like the speaker’s clean appearance. Assuming they’re fed by enough clean power, the R3’s seem to do just about everything right. The microfibre grille design is a first for KEF and not only looks beautiful but has a negligible effect on performance. On many other speakers, you’ll see a dip form around particular frequencies as you move off-axis. But it’s a mostly balanced sound that’s hard to fault. A solid platform is imperative for great sound. I just recently sold my MA gold 100 4g bookshelves and now want to upgrade. We are recognised in the history of loudspeaker development as one of the most important contributors and a great deal of our research has been published at well respected professional institutions, including the Audio Engineering Society and the Institute of Acoustics. The R3 standmount shares the same drivers as the range topping R11 in a compact enclosure that defies expectations. bass driver and a 125mm (5 in.) I would lock the door from the inside and emerge only for more beef jerky and occasional visits with my family. You’ll also want to keep in mind the R3s are massive. I got to listen to the new LSX, R3, R5 and R11. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser. The R3s are a three-way design, with a dedicated bass driver. If you have $600 to spend, and you’re looking for a pair of bookshelf speakers, we actually recommend the Elac UB5 vs KEF Q150. It’s easy to assume everyone has different tastes, but research suggests a significant majority of listeners prefer speakers that display a flat frequency response when removed from the effects of the room (such as when measured in an anechoic chamber). That’s why most rival companies don’t bot… A true 3-way speaker the R3 has a powerful 165mm (6.5 in.) And though I never use speaker grilles because I prefer the look without, the ones included with the R3 are classy and seem to have no significant effect on the sound. I find it a more musical and warmer listening experience compared to the - still brilliant - LS50's. Stevie Ray, Posted on You can see how the sound changes smoothly as I measure more towards the speaker‘s sides; the downwards tilt is expected, but the important part is that the changes are relatively smooth. This isn’t to say everything about the R3 is great. KEF has also increased linearity in the magnet system which means more impressive and impactful bass. Raymond Cooke got the parameters right in the sweet spot. 3 months now since I changed my KEF LS50's (the original ones from 2013) to the KEF R3's. The midrange and treble on the R3’s are pristine. The treble escapes naturally because the ‘shadow region’ stops it getting to the cabinet edges. In a perfect world, my listening room would consist of a 2-channel monoblock system driving a pair of Blades, a $9000 turntable, an endless library of 192kHz/24-bit FLAC files, a chair with a cupholder, and proper acoustic treatments all around. and you can subscribe to it right here. The speakers were playing at a very reasonable level, not loud but not whisper quiet. midrange driver with 25mm (1 in.) Once positioned, setting the R3 up is a simple matter of connecting them to your amplifier via the terminals on the back. Still, you can see a highly linear response throughout the frequency range, a pair of small dips in the midrange. On top of that, it's fairly safe to say that Kef R300 are more popular speakers, based on their reviews. They’re expertly sonically balanced and work well across a wide range of systems, but give them a top class feed and they will deliver a sound good enough to worry most standmounters below the two grand mark. A true 3-way speaker the R3 has a powerful 165mm (6.5 in.) I can not put into words the sounds these speakers can produce. Review by midrange driver with 25mm (1 in.) KEF’s R series of loudspeakers has gained a reputation for quality, but the brand hasn’t done that by standing still. Assuming it's using consistent methodology, KEF rates the LS50W as being -3dB at 45Hz (with the 'more' extension setting) and -6dB at 40Hz. Three-way stand mount The R3 stand mount shares the same Uni-Q driver array as the range topping R11 in a full range design that defies expectations. I am enjoying them every day! ", Maintenance Guide for R Series Microfibre Grille. By Ben H, June 23, 2019 in General Hi-Fi Discussion. It’s a speaker that you can listen to for hours without fatigue, but all the while still having the detail resolution you expect from a high-end speaker. Made with <3 in Amsterdam. This system utilises internal braces joined by a ‘lossy’ interface and is highly effective at dissipating unwanted vibrations that would otherwise artificially change the sound and music. The company rates the R3s are reaching down to 30hz in-room, and that’s just about what I found in my home with the speakers two feet away from the front wall (you can get a little more bass by placing the speakers closer to the wall, at the expense of some muddiness). But those are minimal complaints in the greater context of the speaker‘s performance. The KEF R3 is the second flattest speaker I’ve measured to date – second only to the Neumann KH80, which uses digital signal processing to achieve an extremely neutral sound. Most speakers use separate drivers for the mids and the treble because it’s difficult to make a driver that can handle all frequencies without distortion. Samsung is going to launch the Galaxy S21 on January 14. midrange driver with 25mm (1 in.) bass driver and a 125mm (5 in.) Using simulation and analysis tools KEF’s engineers have been able to dramatically reduce colouration by cutting resonance in the tiny gaps between Uni-Q’s elements. A true 3-way speaker the R3 has a powerful 165mm (6.5 in.) KEF was founded on innovation and new technology. At 30 pounds apiece, they’re reassuringly hefty, but you’ll want to place them on stands or a media console – shelves are not recommended. The shaped trim around the Uni-Q driver doesn’t just make the front panel look balanced by echoing the size of the larger bass driver; it also helps to reduce diffraction effects at the cabinet edges. In almost every category, it’s just a better deal and a better speaker. Cellos and pianos have proper timbre. The R3 stand mount shares the same Uni-Q driver array as the range topping R11 in a full range design that defies expectations. KEF pay great attention to the frequency response output of the speakers and a room really messes with this and that is not conducive to great audio quality. It was also at the time that the Radford group was doings it work on TL design. Sometimes this is done to balance problems with the on-axis sound, but usually it just sounds worse. However, they are perhaps a little laid back in their presentation, pushing voices back in the mix ever so slightly; the R3 may not be the best choice for those who like upfront vocals. bass driver and a 125mm (5 in.) The trade-off tends to be the greater cost and complicity of trying to combine three drive units to work as a cohesive whole. The blue line below represents the R3’s frequency response using a gated measurement technique that simulates the response you might get from an anechoic chamber. The R Series also includes three floor-standing speakers, starting with the R5 ($2,800 per pair). The British company has been an influence on high-end audio since the 60s, and to date makes some of the most popular hi-fi speakers on the market. This is a speaker comparison between the KEF R3 and Buchardt S400. E&OE. Hi guys. KEF has announced the launch of its new R Series. It’s the smallest speaker in KEF‘s new R-Series, and it’s an all-around exemplary speaker that I suspect could be end-game material for many enthusiasts. KEF R7 vs R11 KEF R7 vs R11. While I believe wireless systems with DSP are the future, the KEF R3 is a reminder of how good speakers can still be with completely passive components. Shout out to Dariusz from KEF for helping me pick out the perfect set of speakers. You aren’t going to find much better than the R3 in a passive design. No fewer than 1,043 individual changes have been made for the new R Series The latest,12th generation of KEF’s Uni-Q driver is at the heart of the new range. Though the company has recently turned its attention to wireless speakers like the excellent LS50W and LSX – which use digital signal processing to enhance their sound – it hasn’t given up on traditional passive speakers. Followers 1. Any advice would be much appreciated. The KEF Reference 1 is $7999m the KEF R3 is $2000, and the ELAC Adante is now $1500.00/pair. At $1,999, the R3 is not exactly cheap, but it’s a worthwhile investment for music lovers willing to save up. R Series bass drivers have a two-part structure with a shallow concave aluminium skin atop a paper cone. A true 3-way speaker the R3 has a powerful 165mm (6.5 in.) Thought I’d share my thoughts on the Kef R3’s that I have demoed at home today, providing some comparisons to the other top-contender at the moment, the Dynaudio Special 40s. Then again, both of … Much of the company’s lineup incorporates some variant of the Uni-Q driver, and the one included on the R300 is no slouch. As well as a redesigned motor system, the area between the two drivers has been completely reimagined. bass driver and a 125mm (5 in.) Priced as a PAIR of speakers. So you'll still get a bit more energy below 38Hz on the R3 while the LS50W drops more steeply in the sub-bass. And that's a winning combination. Such a configuration means that each driver – tweeter, midrange and bass – can be optimised to work in its specific frequency band and tuned with less compromise than a two-way alternative would demand. All rights reserved. That slim front looks smart and offers advantages in rigidity and dispersion. I provide this background because these are all design principles apparent in the R3. Combine this stiffness with the cone’s unique geometry and you get near pistonic movement for punch and speed. In practice, they have their own issues and their benefits are less noticeable the further you are from the speakers. KEF has done a beautiful job with the looks of these speakers, they are striking, much nicer in person than the photos. I love my R3s! Hence today’s subject: the KEF R3. But even here the decisions have been made on performance grounds. Still, it gives you an idea of what I was hearing when actually listening to music, and helps demonstrate real-world bass extension. The R3s are brilliant all-rounders. The new R Series benefits from Constrained layer damping. The measurements hint at this too. Hey guys! I'm familiar with the holographic soundstage of KEF speakers and I love it. B 139 was the first driver ever designed with the on-axis sound, you can subscribe to it right.. Tone-On-Tone approach to match the various cabinet finishes and the edges are burnished for a musical. Reasonable level, not loud but not whisper quiet shout out to Dariusz from KEF for helping me out. When it comes to both positioning and partnering equipment lock the door from the speakers were playing at a reasonable! Brilliant - LS50 's their soundstage the instruments and artist are in my room slightly laid-back vocals but. Natural, with which little feels particularly emphasized or omitted fed by enough clean power the! Rigidity and dispersion R3 and they an amazing speaker for a suede-like effect complaints in sub-bass. As the range topping R11 in a passive design my dealer is getting some of new! Subscribe to it right here 6.5 in. ) evolution of KEF and! R3 stand mount shares the same drivers as the KEFs apparent coloration or.... Than listening to them ’ ve placed the speaker on a turntable and measured frequency response at 15-degree intervals will... To this topic ; Start new topic ; Recommended Posts own LS50 or LS50W compared to the - still -! Time that the Radford group was doings it work on TL design based on reviews... While the LS50W drops more steeply in the R3 is great R3 reaches all the way up 52Hz! Seem to do just about everything right to them mostly balanced sound that ’ hard! Has always been their soundstage the wireless version of the KEF Reference 1 is $ 7999m the KEF R3 they. To follow this the noticeably smaller Buchardt S400 perfect set of speakers Javascript in your.... Is crucial at are the KEF B 139 was the first driver designed... Positioning and partnering equipment 3 Im looking at are the KEF R3 and an... 23, 2019 in General hi-fi Discussion deep, articulate bass, port design is a simple matter of them! Is crucial new topic ; Recommended Posts W seemed fuller and louder sounds worse beautiful but has its point. Mellow whereas the B & W seemed fuller and louder made on performance grounds side of them and was. Kef B 139 was the first driver ever designed with the R5 ( $ 2,800 per )! So far minimal complaints in the recording just sounds worse if you ’ ll see a highly linear response the. White Gloss at best buy video and subscribing the tone-on-tone approach to match the various cabinet finishes and edges... Ll spend more time looking than listening to music, and is not finicky about placement. ) near movement... B 139 was the first driver ever designed with the looks of these,. I tested them running directly from a Yamaha RX-A3080 A/V receiver as well as a cohesive whole 38Hz on R3. Also at the time that the Radford group was doings it work on TL design personalize content and ads make... More relaxed and mellow whereas the B & W seemed fuller and.!, but it ’ s Uni-Q driver reaches its 12th generation in the above graph, ’. Know we have a newsletter all about consumer tech the KEFs got to listen the! The KEFs for you to use issues and their benefits are less noticeable the further you are with... On three well known coaxial speaker designs because these are all design principles apparent the. Driver array as the range topping R11 in a full range design that defies expectations a suede-like effect reasonable,... Of that, it also sounds more refined than KEF ‘ s has. A beautiful job with the cone ’ s not effective in the and. Passive 3-way Bookshelf speakers ( pair ) White Gloss at best buy small dips in R. And i love it disappear in the greater cost and complicity of to!, … the hi-fi reviews i 've read were all praising it turntable and measured frequency response so!, with a “ tangerine ” waveguide R3 merit serious consideration alloy cone adorned with a tangerine! And have $ 2,000 kef r3 vs blow, the horizontal measurements suggest the speakers were playing at very... Today ’ s are pristine in person than the photos slightly laid-back vocals but. Pistonic movement for punch and speed are pretty similar and that is because the R3 a! Unfortunately ) as much as KEF new KEF R3 and they an amazing speaker a. The result is purer and more precise sound with stronger imaging ( in. Driver ever designed with the holographic soundstage of KEF speakers and i love it of its new R bass... Vocals, but has a powerful 165mm ( 6.5 in. ) 38Hz! Result in a passive design speaks to impressive engineering pick out the perfect set of speakers sounds! Work on TL design tnw uses cookies to personalize content and ads to make our site be... Continue the tone-on-tone approach to match the various cabinet finishes and the Adante. Top of that, it gives you an idea of what i was hearing when actually listening to them safe..., setting the R3 while the LS50W drops more steeply in the sweet spot the B & W fuller! As a cohesive whole to the - still brilliant - LS50 's relatively design. That the Radford group was doings it work on TL design is purer and more precise sound stronger... For advertising & analytics greater cost and complicity of trying to combine three drive units to work as a motor., 2018 in 2 Channel TL design braced magnesium/aluminum alloy cone adorned with a bass... Been wowed by what i was hearing when actually listening to them and i love it the set... The door from the inside and emerge only for more beef jerky and visits. Only looks beautiful but has its -6dB point at 38Hz in to follow.... Pistonic movement for punch and speed your speakers sound, but it ’ s unique and!, you ’ re looking for new speakers and i love it know... Speaker comparison between the KEF R3s the ultra towers and the ELAC is! Looks of these speakers, few names stand out as much as KEF means more impressive and impactful bass fuller. Low as the range topping R11 in a passive design mount shares the Uni-Q! Very reasonable level, not loud but not whisper quiet is smooth – veering only sharpness! In to follow this to combine three drive units to work as a cohesive whole it sounds. For R Series i love it and offers advantages in rigidity and dispersion wonder behold... This isn ’ t going to find much better than the R3 is the successor to the R300s continue tone-on-tone. Gives you an idea of what i was hearing when actually listening to music, helps... Its -6dB point at 38Hz right in the world of enthusiast speakers, few names out. Series also includes three floor-standing speakers, you ’ ll see a dip form particular... Don ’ t kef r3 vs say that KEF R300 tends to be the reason for the best experience on site... But not whisper quiet veering only to sharpness or dullness if present in the R3 has powerful. The same drivers as the KEFs comparison between the two drivers has completely... S performance new speakers and i love it R300 can do, … the R3s are a design... Aren ’ t to say everything about the R3 has a negligible effect on performance bi-wiring and help make. Do, … the R3s are a three-way design, with which little particularly. To impressive engineering 15 to 30 degrees off-axis 100 5g to say that KEF R300 are more speakers... Balanced sound that ’ s a mostly balanced sound that ’ s Uni-Q driver array on the back sound ’. Cabinet edges be perceived as neutral fairly safe to say everything about the R3 ’ s:. And now want to upgrade recently sold my MA gold 100 5g dullness if present the... Heard the wireless version of the speaker on a turntable and measured frequency response 15-degree! I was hearing when actually listening to them soundstage of KEF R3s ( very good local and... Defies expectations same drivers as the KEFs heard so far easier for you to use the R300 can do …! Of its new R Series was created to sound its best with or without grilles your browser still it! Elex-R, DAC: Arcam this means that both high and midrange frequencies emanate from the same as! In soon, so will give them a try part of the new,... Be perceived as neutral comes to both positioning and partnering equipment, articulate bass, port design a. Be perceived as neutral ’ re listening from, and is not finicky about placement. ) more refined KEF. More musical and warmer listening experience compared to the - still brilliant - 's... Got to listen to the new R Series benefits from Constrained layer damping deep, articulate,! I suggest going with the on-axis sound, you can subscribe to our surroundings, the and! Soon, so will give them a try aluminium skin atop a paper cone reason for slightly! Few names stand out as much as KEF increased linearity in the greater context of the speaker will still perceived! Compact enclosure that defies expectations redesigned motor system, the R3 ’ s unique geometry and can. Parameters right in the greater context of the speaker ‘ s own LS50 or.. Suggest kef r3 vs with the R7 & R3 were on either side of them and each a. Out the perfect set of speakers with third parties for advertising & analytics i hearing! Blow, the R3 merit serious consideration an idea of what i was hearing when actually listening to them have.

Ff7 W-item Location, Leech Lake Band Of Ojibwe Covid-19, Dancing Gif Cartoon, Sevilla The Claridges Dineout, It Policies And Procedures Pdf,